LLM Guide
  • An introduction to Large Language Models
  • Understanding Pre-trained Language Models
  • Solutions to LLM Challenges
    • Prompt Engineering
    • Neuro-Symbolic Methods
    • Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)
    • Honorable Mentions
  • Fine-Tuning
  • Supervised Fine-Tuning Strategies
    • Full Parameter Fine-Tuning
    • Half Fine-Tuning (HFT)
    • Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT)
      • LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation)
      • QLoRA (Quantized LoRA)
      • DoRA (Decomposed Low-Rank Adaptation)
      • NEFTune (Noise-Enhanced Fine-Tuning)
  • Fine-tuning Best Practices
  • Fine-tuning Using Ubiai (No-Codesolution)
  • Evaluation of Fine-Tuned Models
    • Evaluation Techniques
    • Task specific Evaluation Metrics
    • Popular Benchmarks
    • Best Practices for Model Evaluation
  • Directory of Links By Section
Powered by GitBook
On this page

Evaluation of Fine-Tuned Models

PreviousFine-tuning Using Ubiai (No-Codesolution)NextEvaluation Techniques

Last updated 4 months ago

Evaluating fine-tuned models is an important step in the development process, as it ensures the model performs well on the target task and generalizes effectively to unseen data. Without thorough evaluation, it’s impossible to determine whether the fine-tuning process has succeeded or if adjustments are needed to improve performance. This step also helps identify potential biases, weaknesses, or overfitting issues that might hinder the model's real-world applicability. In this section, we will explore key evaluation strategies, metrics, and best practices to assess the effectiveness of your fine-tuned model comprehensively.

Evaluation Techniques
Task specific Evaluation Metrics
Popular Benchmarks
Best Practices for Model Evaluation